glm matlab function fitlm Search Results


90
MathWorks Inc generalized linear mixed-effects model fitlme
Generalized Linear Mixed Effects Model Fitlme, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/generalized linear mixed-effects model fitlme/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
generalized linear mixed-effects model fitlme - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc fitlm.m function
Fitlm.M Function, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fitlm.m function/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fitlm.m function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc matlab r2016a
Matlab R2016a, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab r2016a/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab r2016a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc fitlme function
Fitlme Function, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fitlme function/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fitlme function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc fitlm function
Fitlm Function, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fitlm function/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fitlm function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc glm matlab function fitlm
a The coefficient of partial determination (CPD, calculated for each neuron) from a <t>general</t> <t>linear</t> encoding <t>model</t> was used to estimate the proportion of total pseudopopulation firing rate variance around pokes that was either unexplained (white bars) or that could be explained by our four regressors ( P oke C ontext, S ample Port, C hoice Port, and O utcome). Numbers under each regressor represent the mean CPD (% variance explained) across five 200 ms time bins around the poke for that regressor (this time frame can be visualized in the following panel, 5b). A one-way ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of subregion on explainable variance, F(2, 985) = 44.54, p = 3.02e-19. Bonferroni post-hoc comparisons found that the MOs had the most explainable variance among subregions, while vmPFC contained the least (black asterisks, MOs vs. dmPFC p = 3.02e-7, MOs vs vmPFC p = 8.78e-20, dmPFC vs vmPFC, p = 5.35e-5). Furthermore, in each subregion, one-way ANOVAs with Bonferroni post-hoc tests found that of the four regressors, Poke Context (PC) was the largest contributor to explained variability. Colored asterisks represent significant differences within subregions between the CPD values for Poke Context and all three other regressors. b Looking at the CPD of Poke Context in isolation at all time points around the poke, we confirm that this regressor accounts for significantly more firing rate variability in the MOs at all time points around pokes, followed by dmPFC and then vmPFC. Double-colored straight lines represent statistically significant differences (p-value < .05) between the two respective subregions in that time bin, after correcting for both false discovery rate and family-wise error rate (see Methods). Lighter shaded areas above and below the solid lines represent the standard error of the mean CPD from the pseudopopulation at each time point. c Despite MOs containing the highest CPD for Poke Context, Poke Context is decodable with nearly 100% accuracy in all regions around pokes using a linear support vector machine. Chance level decoding in the shuffled control (dashed lines) is 1/3. d Subsampled SVMs revealed that the MOs can decode Poke Context with fewer cells than the other subregions.
Glm Matlab Function Fitlm, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/glm matlab function fitlm/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
glm matlab function fitlm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc matlab function fitlm
a The coefficient of partial determination (CPD, calculated for each neuron) from a <t>general</t> <t>linear</t> encoding <t>model</t> was used to estimate the proportion of total pseudopopulation firing rate variance around pokes that was either unexplained (white bars) or that could be explained by our four regressors ( P oke C ontext, S ample Port, C hoice Port, and O utcome). Numbers under each regressor represent the mean CPD (% variance explained) across five 200 ms time bins around the poke for that regressor (this time frame can be visualized in the following panel, 5b). A one-way ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of subregion on explainable variance, F(2, 985) = 44.54, p = 3.02e-19. Bonferroni post-hoc comparisons found that the MOs had the most explainable variance among subregions, while vmPFC contained the least (black asterisks, MOs vs. dmPFC p = 3.02e-7, MOs vs vmPFC p = 8.78e-20, dmPFC vs vmPFC, p = 5.35e-5). Furthermore, in each subregion, one-way ANOVAs with Bonferroni post-hoc tests found that of the four regressors, Poke Context (PC) was the largest contributor to explained variability. Colored asterisks represent significant differences within subregions between the CPD values for Poke Context and all three other regressors. b Looking at the CPD of Poke Context in isolation at all time points around the poke, we confirm that this regressor accounts for significantly more firing rate variability in the MOs at all time points around pokes, followed by dmPFC and then vmPFC. Double-colored straight lines represent statistically significant differences (p-value < .05) between the two respective subregions in that time bin, after correcting for both false discovery rate and family-wise error rate (see Methods). Lighter shaded areas above and below the solid lines represent the standard error of the mean CPD from the pseudopopulation at each time point. c Despite MOs containing the highest CPD for Poke Context, Poke Context is decodable with nearly 100% accuracy in all regions around pokes using a linear support vector machine. Chance level decoding in the shuffled control (dashed lines) is 1/3. d Subsampled SVMs revealed that the MOs can decode Poke Context with fewer cells than the other subregions.
Matlab Function Fitlm, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab function fitlm/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab function fitlm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc fitlme
a The coefficient of partial determination (CPD, calculated for each neuron) from a <t>general</t> <t>linear</t> encoding <t>model</t> was used to estimate the proportion of total pseudopopulation firing rate variance around pokes that was either unexplained (white bars) or that could be explained by our four regressors ( P oke C ontext, S ample Port, C hoice Port, and O utcome). Numbers under each regressor represent the mean CPD (% variance explained) across five 200 ms time bins around the poke for that regressor (this time frame can be visualized in the following panel, 5b). A one-way ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of subregion on explainable variance, F(2, 985) = 44.54, p = 3.02e-19. Bonferroni post-hoc comparisons found that the MOs had the most explainable variance among subregions, while vmPFC contained the least (black asterisks, MOs vs. dmPFC p = 3.02e-7, MOs vs vmPFC p = 8.78e-20, dmPFC vs vmPFC, p = 5.35e-5). Furthermore, in each subregion, one-way ANOVAs with Bonferroni post-hoc tests found that of the four regressors, Poke Context (PC) was the largest contributor to explained variability. Colored asterisks represent significant differences within subregions between the CPD values for Poke Context and all three other regressors. b Looking at the CPD of Poke Context in isolation at all time points around the poke, we confirm that this regressor accounts for significantly more firing rate variability in the MOs at all time points around pokes, followed by dmPFC and then vmPFC. Double-colored straight lines represent statistically significant differences (p-value < .05) between the two respective subregions in that time bin, after correcting for both false discovery rate and family-wise error rate (see Methods). Lighter shaded areas above and below the solid lines represent the standard error of the mean CPD from the pseudopopulation at each time point. c Despite MOs containing the highest CPD for Poke Context, Poke Context is decodable with nearly 100% accuracy in all regions around pokes using a linear support vector machine. Chance level decoding in the shuffled control (dashed lines) is 1/3. d Subsampled SVMs revealed that the MOs can decode Poke Context with fewer cells than the other subregions.
Fitlme, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fitlme/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fitlme - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc general linear model (glm)
a The coefficient of partial determination (CPD, calculated for each neuron) from a <t>general</t> <t>linear</t> encoding <t>model</t> was used to estimate the proportion of total pseudopopulation firing rate variance around pokes that was either unexplained (white bars) or that could be explained by our four regressors ( P oke C ontext, S ample Port, C hoice Port, and O utcome). Numbers under each regressor represent the mean CPD (% variance explained) across five 200 ms time bins around the poke for that regressor (this time frame can be visualized in the following panel, 5b). A one-way ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of subregion on explainable variance, F(2, 985) = 44.54, p = 3.02e-19. Bonferroni post-hoc comparisons found that the MOs had the most explainable variance among subregions, while vmPFC contained the least (black asterisks, MOs vs. dmPFC p = 3.02e-7, MOs vs vmPFC p = 8.78e-20, dmPFC vs vmPFC, p = 5.35e-5). Furthermore, in each subregion, one-way ANOVAs with Bonferroni post-hoc tests found that of the four regressors, Poke Context (PC) was the largest contributor to explained variability. Colored asterisks represent significant differences within subregions between the CPD values for Poke Context and all three other regressors. b Looking at the CPD of Poke Context in isolation at all time points around the poke, we confirm that this regressor accounts for significantly more firing rate variability in the MOs at all time points around pokes, followed by dmPFC and then vmPFC. Double-colored straight lines represent statistically significant differences (p-value < .05) between the two respective subregions in that time bin, after correcting for both false discovery rate and family-wise error rate (see Methods). Lighter shaded areas above and below the solid lines represent the standard error of the mean CPD from the pseudopopulation at each time point. c Despite MOs containing the highest CPD for Poke Context, Poke Context is decodable with nearly 100% accuracy in all regions around pokes using a linear support vector machine. Chance level decoding in the shuffled control (dashed lines) is 1/3. d Subsampled SVMs revealed that the MOs can decode Poke Context with fewer cells than the other subregions.
General Linear Model (Glm), supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/general linear model (glm)/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
general linear model (glm) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MathWorks Inc 2021b
a The coefficient of partial determination (CPD, calculated for each neuron) from a <t>general</t> <t>linear</t> encoding <t>model</t> was used to estimate the proportion of total pseudopopulation firing rate variance around pokes that was either unexplained (white bars) or that could be explained by our four regressors ( P oke C ontext, S ample Port, C hoice Port, and O utcome). Numbers under each regressor represent the mean CPD (% variance explained) across five 200 ms time bins around the poke for that regressor (this time frame can be visualized in the following panel, 5b). A one-way ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of subregion on explainable variance, F(2, 985) = 44.54, p = 3.02e-19. Bonferroni post-hoc comparisons found that the MOs had the most explainable variance among subregions, while vmPFC contained the least (black asterisks, MOs vs. dmPFC p = 3.02e-7, MOs vs vmPFC p = 8.78e-20, dmPFC vs vmPFC, p = 5.35e-5). Furthermore, in each subregion, one-way ANOVAs with Bonferroni post-hoc tests found that of the four regressors, Poke Context (PC) was the largest contributor to explained variability. Colored asterisks represent significant differences within subregions between the CPD values for Poke Context and all three other regressors. b Looking at the CPD of Poke Context in isolation at all time points around the poke, we confirm that this regressor accounts for significantly more firing rate variability in the MOs at all time points around pokes, followed by dmPFC and then vmPFC. Double-colored straight lines represent statistically significant differences (p-value < .05) between the two respective subregions in that time bin, after correcting for both false discovery rate and family-wise error rate (see Methods). Lighter shaded areas above and below the solid lines represent the standard error of the mean CPD from the pseudopopulation at each time point. c Despite MOs containing the highest CPD for Poke Context, Poke Context is decodable with nearly 100% accuracy in all regions around pokes using a linear support vector machine. Chance level decoding in the shuffled control (dashed lines) is 1/3. d Subsampled SVMs revealed that the MOs can decode Poke Context with fewer cells than the other subregions.
2021b, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/2021b/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
2021b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


a The coefficient of partial determination (CPD, calculated for each neuron) from a general linear encoding model was used to estimate the proportion of total pseudopopulation firing rate variance around pokes that was either unexplained (white bars) or that could be explained by our four regressors ( P oke C ontext, S ample Port, C hoice Port, and O utcome). Numbers under each regressor represent the mean CPD (% variance explained) across five 200 ms time bins around the poke for that regressor (this time frame can be visualized in the following panel, 5b). A one-way ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of subregion on explainable variance, F(2, 985) = 44.54, p = 3.02e-19. Bonferroni post-hoc comparisons found that the MOs had the most explainable variance among subregions, while vmPFC contained the least (black asterisks, MOs vs. dmPFC p = 3.02e-7, MOs vs vmPFC p = 8.78e-20, dmPFC vs vmPFC, p = 5.35e-5). Furthermore, in each subregion, one-way ANOVAs with Bonferroni post-hoc tests found that of the four regressors, Poke Context (PC) was the largest contributor to explained variability. Colored asterisks represent significant differences within subregions between the CPD values for Poke Context and all three other regressors. b Looking at the CPD of Poke Context in isolation at all time points around the poke, we confirm that this regressor accounts for significantly more firing rate variability in the MOs at all time points around pokes, followed by dmPFC and then vmPFC. Double-colored straight lines represent statistically significant differences (p-value < .05) between the two respective subregions in that time bin, after correcting for both false discovery rate and family-wise error rate (see Methods). Lighter shaded areas above and below the solid lines represent the standard error of the mean CPD from the pseudopopulation at each time point. c Despite MOs containing the highest CPD for Poke Context, Poke Context is decodable with nearly 100% accuracy in all regions around pokes using a linear support vector machine. Chance level decoding in the shuffled control (dashed lines) is 1/3. d Subsampled SVMs revealed that the MOs can decode Poke Context with fewer cells than the other subregions.

Journal: Communications Biology

Article Title: Divergent subregional information processing in mouse prefrontal cortex during working memory

doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06926-8

Figure Lengend Snippet: a The coefficient of partial determination (CPD, calculated for each neuron) from a general linear encoding model was used to estimate the proportion of total pseudopopulation firing rate variance around pokes that was either unexplained (white bars) or that could be explained by our four regressors ( P oke C ontext, S ample Port, C hoice Port, and O utcome). Numbers under each regressor represent the mean CPD (% variance explained) across five 200 ms time bins around the poke for that regressor (this time frame can be visualized in the following panel, 5b). A one-way ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of subregion on explainable variance, F(2, 985) = 44.54, p = 3.02e-19. Bonferroni post-hoc comparisons found that the MOs had the most explainable variance among subregions, while vmPFC contained the least (black asterisks, MOs vs. dmPFC p = 3.02e-7, MOs vs vmPFC p = 8.78e-20, dmPFC vs vmPFC, p = 5.35e-5). Furthermore, in each subregion, one-way ANOVAs with Bonferroni post-hoc tests found that of the four regressors, Poke Context (PC) was the largest contributor to explained variability. Colored asterisks represent significant differences within subregions between the CPD values for Poke Context and all three other regressors. b Looking at the CPD of Poke Context in isolation at all time points around the poke, we confirm that this regressor accounts for significantly more firing rate variability in the MOs at all time points around pokes, followed by dmPFC and then vmPFC. Double-colored straight lines represent statistically significant differences (p-value < .05) between the two respective subregions in that time bin, after correcting for both false discovery rate and family-wise error rate (see Methods). Lighter shaded areas above and below the solid lines represent the standard error of the mean CPD from the pseudopopulation at each time point. c Despite MOs containing the highest CPD for Poke Context, Poke Context is decodable with nearly 100% accuracy in all regions around pokes using a linear support vector machine. Chance level decoding in the shuffled control (dashed lines) is 1/3. d Subsampled SVMs revealed that the MOs can decode Poke Context with fewer cells than the other subregions.

Article Snippet: We used two separate general linear model designs (GLM, MATLAB function fitlm ) to characterize how neurons in each region encoded multiple DNMTP task variables simultaneously.

Techniques: Isolation, Plasmid Preparation, Control